THE POLYGRAPH
‘I didn’t!’ the March Hare interrupted in a great
hurry.
‘You did!’ said the Hatter.
‘I deny it!’ said the March Hare.
‘He denies it,’ said the King: ‘Leave out that
part.’
DEAR READER,
This embarrassingly egocentric Jonker chappie - ex-policeman
and Security Manager of
The Urban Safari Club has “managed” to perpetrate 44 attempted
murders and approximately 700 assaults against me on the premises of Bell/John
Deere (1997 - 2006) – and, sadly, despite their most ardent endeavours, they have
failed to murder me. Tsk-tsk.
Dear Reader, I don’t know about you but had I been the Security
Manager on this patch, and had the very first incident of this obscene matter been
reported to me, in addition to using the polygraph, I would have had the cops crawling
all over it. There is no shortage of resources here – not with my Chief of Police
buddy down at the local police station.
Jonker – and the other criminal managers of the Urban
Safari Club (Finnotti, Osbourne, Scobie, McDuling, Machanick and Gary Bell (CEO)
et al) have consistently refused to interview witnesses or use the polygraph to
investigate and put an end to these murderous attacks by their in-house killer.
Dear
Reader, Never mind interviewing
the witnesses, just take the polygraph alone: These managers have had, at the very least, 8 classical, made–for–the–polygraph
opportunities to resolve this matter. Hmmm.
This current period must be a particularly trying one for
the USC. The loss of control, the inability to manipulate people and dominate
the course of events, and now - horror of horrors! - their top secret fun-time
murder safari is exposed to the eyes of the world. Tsk-tsk.
Indeed, they have compounded their predicament with the
panic-stricken hiring of a criminal defence attorney to threaten me in the
event that I expose this Murder Conspiracy. Yup! No doubt about it – this is definitely
a trying time. My heartfelt sympathy chaps.
Dear Reader, Pardon the small
digression here but the understanding of the following two points has a crucial
bearing on this Murder Conspiracy.
1)
Under Criminal Law, the criterion for determining guilt is “Beyond reasonable
doubt”. However, under Labour Law the criterion for determining guilt is “On
the balance of probabilities”.
“The employer is however not required to prove the misconduct beyond
reasonable doubt. It is sufficient if the employer has reason to believe, on
the balance of probabilities, that
an offence has been committed e.g.:
Would a reasonable person, having the same evidence placed before him, come to
the same conclusion?”
2) On
the 3/9/99, the Public Prosecutor - Mrs. Besseseur – had strongly advised me to
join the union – NUMSA –and to take this matter to the CCMA. I am not a “union
kind of guy” but under the circumstances, I took her advice and joined NUMSA -
a black union that had the mandate at
Right, we’re off on safari…. The first time that Jonker
refused to use the polygraph to resolve this matter was on the 31/10/1997, after
the USC’s in-house killer - ensuring that there were no witnesses - violently attacked
me in the company gym - and promptly received a reality check (I am well
capable of taking care of myself - as the USC discovered – much to their chagrin.)
This attack was an ABC case for the polygraph and Jonker (Security Manager) should
have resolved this criminal matter within hours. So what happened??
Astonishingly,
the Jonker chappie chose not to use the polygraph and instead threatened me
with dismissal!! (Dear Reader, I kid you not!!). He then topped it off with “If you are fired, I
will put the word out and you will never find work in this area” Tut-tut!! No doubt here that the Jonker chappie will
be more than happy to take the polygraph on this.
The next manager to refuse to use the polygraph (24/4/1998)
was Fosco Finotti, the Workshop Manager. Finotti is Jonker’s buddy and the assaults
and murder attempts were taking place on Finotti’s patch almost on a daily
basis. (Dear Reader, There
is not a Workshop Manager in the world that does not know what is taking place
in his own workshop.)
These times were not for the faint hearted as their
in-house killer had been given the nod and would surreptitiously stalk me in
the factory. He would wait to catch me in an area where there were no witnesses
about and then charge and try to head-butt or send me crashing into piles of
steel or best-bet, knock me off the first floor landing down onto the workshop floor.
I kept Jonker
fully aware of this murderous behaviour. Polygraph
anyone?
On the 7/3/2000, at
the 2nd Hearing, Jonker, (Security Manager) together with Scobie (HR
Manager) and McDuling (Workshop Manager) unlawfully refused to bring an end to
this murderous business. Jonker (appointed as the investigating officer) had
refused to use the polygraph or to interview witnesses who had submitted
affidavits testifying to his in-house killer’s assaults and violence. (Lest it
be forgotten here – Jonker is an ex-police officer.)
These chappies, Jonker, Scobie and McDuling found this
all hugely entertaining. I tried to bring in a witness (my legal right) and
McDuling refused to allow it. He asked me if my witness liked their in-house
killer and I replied in the negative. Immensely pleased with this response, he reclined
in his chair and, favouring me with a huge smirk, shrugged.
(Dear
Reader, I kid you not. To
get a feel for the ambience at this Hearing, check out the 1964 LIFE magazine
picture of Sheriff Rainey at his arraignment. What’s that you say?? This Bell/John
Deere Murder Conspiracy is now on the internet? Oh really? ….. Shrug.)
The next instance of refusing to use the polygraph was
on the 11/4/2001 when Eric the Shop Steward informed me that McDuling was opposed
to using the polygraph. No reason. Then, on the 8/5/2001, he informed me that the
noble Machanick (Head of HR) had stated that “They were not going to use the
polygraph as it is too expensive!”
Dear Reader, Help me here - I’m not too bright. Machanick says
Bell/John Deere cannot afford US $ 70 to put a stop to their man trying to kill
me on the premises? If I am personally prepared to pay for the polygraph then how
expensive can this polygraph be?
On the 7/8/2001 McDuling stated that he would speak to
Machanick about the latest violent assault that had taken place next to my
office – just down the corridor from his own office. He wanted an affidavit –
which I gave him - and I asked him to use the polygraph.
A week later (14/08/2001) I queried the progress of
the matter and with a smile, he informed me that he had handed the matter over
to Jonker!! Strangely, just over a week later (23/8/2001) there was another
violent attack on me – in the corridor just outside McDuling’s office. I
immediately reported this to McDuling and once again I asked for the polygraph.
McDuling called the USC’s in –house killer into his
office and asked him if he was prepared to take the polygraph. The chappie then
stated “I welcome the polygraph”. McDuling then said that he would set it up. A
month went by and nothing happened. I went and asked McDuling what was
happening with the polygraph. With the same smile, he stated that, again, he
had handed the matter over to the Jonker chappie. Ho hum….. Shrug.
On the
21/11/2001 I phoned the Jonker chappie and asked him what was causing the hold
up. He told me that he would be speaking to the CEO - Gary Bell - about using
the polygraph for this and that he would get back to me by 9:00 the next day. Yup!
You guessed it. I’m still waiting. Dear Reader, Why
on earth would he need to speak to the
Anyway, back on safari…. During the next Hearing on the 18/6/2002, having previously stated to
McDuling that “I welcome the polygraph”, the USC’s in-house killer turned
around and refused to take the polygraph, stating,” ….my word is good enough
and ...
Less than a month later (2/7/2002) Shop Steward Eric
informed me that the illustrious Machanick chappie had stated, once again, that
“they” (read USC) were not going to use the polygraph to resolve this matter. No
reason was given. (Golly!! I wonder why not??)
On the 12/8/2002, I personally undertook (and paid
for) a polygraph exam. On the 10/12/2002 I startled the hell out of the HR
officer by trying to submit this polygraph in order to resolve this murderous
matter. He refused to accept it. (Hmmm. I wonder why not??).
Anyway, the… Oh hullo, what’s this??... Hmmm. It looks
like excerpts from ONLINE@BELL.CO.ZA
1999 – the
Golly!! A spot of skullduggery in the Pay Office - which
Jonker and HR sorted out with the polygraph and… Horrors!! .. a strong
statement condemning violence against one’s fellow employees!! My goodness!! Dear Reader, Honest Injun, these excerpts were published while the
USC was hell-bent on trying to murder me on the premises of Bell/John Deere.
If I was a member of the USC, the greatest threat to me
would be public exposure and I would certainly not interview witnesses or use
the polygraph. Crucially, I would make very sure that this “difficult” safari stayed
under tight control on the premises of Bell/John Deere.
Dear
Reader, The Urban Safari
Club did not even consider the
possibility that this murder safari would be uncovered – let alone exposed on the
internet. Why not?? Hmm? Dear Reader, It’s quite simple really: This safari should have
ended with my death.
BROCK of the BUSHVELD
CONFIDENTIAL POLYGRAPH REPORT
